Friday, May 20, 2005

More on a theme:

Army addresses spate of recruiting misconduct

The Army is examining allegations its recruiters offered to help people cheat on drug tests or get phony diplomas in order to enlist.

In a recent incident in Texas, a recruiter threatened a 20-year-old man with arrest if he did not get to an interview at a recruiting station by a given time. The recruiter then sought to explain the threat as a "marketing technique."

I'm predicting there will be a draft just after the 2006 elections if the Rebublicans maintain control.

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Maybe I've been wrong all along. Maybe I was I taught wrong all along. All my life I have been led to believe that my country, would always do it's best too find justice for all. It's in our pledge of allegiance that conservatives insist I say everyday at school, "... with liberty and justice for all." I was also taught that other countries weren't quite as great as ours and didn't always value justice like we did and thats why I should be proud of my country. I should feel lucky I live here and not some other places because your country would always back you up, whether you were right or wrong you always had freedom of speech. We are better than countries like China and Uezesbeckastan... right? After reading this and seeing what went on at Aub Grabh, I'm left wondering. Don't try to tell me 9-11 changed everything because thats what the terrorists wanted when they took our towers down. They wanted to take down what makes this country great, the fact that we can look at the rest of the world and some of the horrible things people do to each other in other countries and say "we are better than that." But maybe it's only true as long as your were born in Philadelphia like I was. I'm sure half the men in the story your about to read were completely Innocent, after all the red cross did a study on how many prisoners at Aub Grabh were actually guilty of a crime and it turned out that %90 were completely Innocent. It doesn't matter though no one should be treated like this. I was always taught the United States is better than this.


Officers staged mock executions

By John J. Lumpkin
Associated Press

Two Army officers staged mock executions of Iraqi prisoners in 2003 and were given career-ending punishments, according to military officials and newly released documents.
Mock executions — in which a prisoner is made to believe his execution is imminent — are expressly prohibited by Army interrogation policy as a form of torture, according to the Army field manual.

The details of the investigations into the two officers were described in documents sought by the American Civil Liberties Union under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The Army provided the documents to reporters on Tuesday.

In one case, on July 13, 2003, Capt. Shawn L. Martin, of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, based in Fort Carson, Colo., took an Iraqi welder out to the desert and had him dig his own grave before staging an attempt to shoot him, according to documents. The captain was looking for information on a bombing two days before.

The welder was released. The captain also captured eight people in the vehicle and at one point fired his gun to make the seven passengers believe he had just killed the driver. He then went to the home of a man, whose identity was provided by the driver, and threatened to kill him in front of his family.

The documents do not say whether the victims had any connection to the bombing.

Martin was court-martialed, convicted of aggravated assault and battery and sentenced to 45 days confinement and loss of $12,000 in pay, said an Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Jeremy Martin, who is not related to him.

During his court-martial, witnesses said the Army captain ruled like a tyrant over Rutbah, a community of 25,000 in Iraq’s western desert. His attorney said that no one was ever harmed by his actions and that Martin did what was necessary to protect his troops. The conviction effectively ends Capt. Martin’s career, military officials said.

The other mock execution involved an Army second lieutenant with the 3rd Brigade of 1st Armored Division, based in Fort Riley, Kan., who received administrative punishment and an other-than-honorable discharge from the service, the Army spokesman said.

He said the man’s last name was Yancy, but he could not provide his first name.

The documents describe two alleged mock executions involving the lieutenant and a sergeant in June 2003. In at least one of the cases the victim was a looter.

Other alleged abuses described in the documents include:

• Several soldiers who were investigated for a staged photograph with a hooded detainee. There was no evidence the detainee was physically abused, but such photographs are a violation of policy.

• A soldier was investigated for taunting a Muslim detainee with the Jewish Star of David.

Full story here --

So we've come to this to get kids into the military:

Rift over recruiting at public high schools

From the article:

...the No Child Left Behind Act requires that schools receiving federal funding must release the names of its students to recruiters

Did anyone know this? Sneaky, sneaky Bush administration. It sounds like extorsion.

I also find this part interesting:

Nationally, there's a growing sense that recruiters desperate to bolster falling enlistment numbers are misrepresenting sign-up agreements to entice recruits. In response to 480 allegations of improprieties by recruiters since Oct. 1, the Army announced it will suspend its recruiting for one day on May 20, so commanders can remind its 7,500 recruiters of proper conduct.

Douglas Smith, a US Army spokesman, said the job of recruiters is not to make promises but to show applicants possibilities and career options.

"As for a recruiter making promises and not following through, the recruiter's not in any position to promise anything. We hope that all our recruiters are communicating honestly with our applicants," Mr. Smith said. But he added, "In the contract [between the new soldier and the Army] it says, 'Anything the recruiter may have promised me is moot.' "

It's so obvious, from the disclaimer, that the military recruiters are ENCOURAGED to misrepresent the sign-up agreements, otherwise, why have the disclaimer?

With recruitment numbers way down, can anyone else smell a draft coming?

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Bush's choice for US ambassador to the UN, in his own words


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?